Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Reply to criticism

PA Wellington Law courts should face up to their responsibilities t 0 impose penalties to deal with violence, said the Minister of Police (Mr Couch) last evening. If they did so there would be a “lot less violence on the streets,” he said. Earlier this week a Wellington District Court judge, Judge BeatoOr., criticised thei Minister’s warning that the police would meet violence with violence. It was not. Judge Bearson said, the; function of the police to i take the law into their own: hands. Their role was toi bring offenders to court so; they could be dealt with by, New Zealand law. Judge Beatson advised a( youth who said he had been ; beaten up by the police toi lay a complaint. That, Mr: Couch told Porirua Rota-' rians last evening, was “fair■ enough." * .‘But when Judge Beatson; says the courts are the place : to” deal with violence, he is

i on less stable ground,” Mr • Couch said. "A large propori tion of the letters 1 get from 1 long-suffering members of the public complain bitterly ' about the courts’ apparent reluctance to do anything I more about violence than to i give offenders what I once described as a slap, on the wrist with a wet bus ticket.” “The courts should be the H place to deal with violence. 'As soon as they start to J face up to their responsi.'bilities, as a few are begin:(ning to do now, we can (hope to see a lot less violence on the streets,” Mr (Couch said. i “The penalties are there, (in law. But only the courts ;can use them. If they will mot do this, there are only ; twa choices left. Either we (let criminals beat up citizens ;and the police with impun-( ;ity, or we stand up to them (ourselves,” he said. I “While I am Minister of (Police, I .will not ask any : policeman or policewoman; to take punishment without I

• the right to retaliate. So ■ long as they do not start the i violence, I am on their side r 100 per cent.” Judge Beatson said it was ; not the function of the ; police to take the law into > their own hands. The police ; were well paid and trained ; and their role was to bring onenders to court so that > they could be dealt with by . New Zealand law. > He said he had read a ■ newspaper report last Friday ■ 'that quoted Mr Couch as i: saying: “The police are there ■(to uphold law and order. If ■; circumstances arise we will • meet violence with vio- , lence.” J Judge Beatson said Mr (Couch might have been re- -• ported out of context, but he ; could assure the public and jthe police that as far as the (courts were concerned the ' police were not to take the j matter of dealing with violent offenders into their own hands. The offenders 'would be dealt with in I court.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19810410.2.105

Bibliographic details

Press, 10 April 1981, Page 23

Word Count
488

Reply to criticism Press, 10 April 1981, Page 23

Reply to criticism Press, 10 April 1981, Page 23

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert