Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Road points system

The .demerit-points system i of penalising -bad drivers was time-consuming, but it; was an important part of the enforcement of roadsafety laws,' said; the Chief ’Traffic Officer ■ Tn 'ChristJi church'(Mr R. W. Fox). ! He said that there was no. ’ question of the Ministry of ; Transport’s , having let the .jsystem slip into the background.- - :[ “It is a counselling service!. I: which, is seen as .being pref-1- ; erable . to. having^. offending) I drivers ~ ih' ‘ court, all the ;• time,”, he. said. " . I '! Several Christchurch I 'drivers lost their..,;licences;: • last year by accuriiulating' ■. more. thari- 100-pointsl- .. . |! When a? driver , is -con-i. victed of a-traffic offence, j and the court, does not dis-j qualify him. or her-for at; least three, months, points':

i are put - on a. personal “record.” W-.. •- - | .Serious offences such , as driving while intoxicated, or dangerous driving/ .cost 40 points, although- a qualification of more than three months is usually imposed. - 1 ' ■■ -. If 60 points are accumulated, the Ministry of Transport personally advises the driver of the consequences of adding to that total. At 80 points, the driver.'is ■called in for an 'interview iwith, a senior traffic officer. I Mr Fox said that 16.-inter-views were- held during No- ! vember and December last l/year. Although that was not !;a large number, it shbuld. be that it often [took several offences to accumulate enough points for i an interview.■ j He said that the- only 7 way ! :the - success of . the- system

hcbuld- be measured siwould be(to find out, how many of thei si “interviewees” reoffended,■but- that would , : be - a rtimeiiconsuming task;,-. J : Traffic, officers' make; p6rcsonal observations oh the atititude of : the .driver, at the | interview, ind advise whethi er. he or she would -be likely •jto reoffend.» , '- - - . . H All points are adtbmatical;ly removed from drivers’ records if they, ppmtiiit an . offende-'.vihich results.: ih'-,.a ' disqualification) / period.* 'of three. 1 months or more, or two years after the con- • victioh. ■ • iMr Fox said some drivers :. would always reoffend, -They ; the examples iwhok were i bound by trie court ltd attend driving; •Ibut did not take any notice jof the. courses,. 1 “Nothing is totally* effeci tive'.-” ; .’he said:

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19810112.2.66

Bibliographic details

Press, 12 January 1981, Page 9

Word Count
357

Road points system Press, 12 January 1981, Page 9

Road points system Press, 12 January 1981, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert