Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Foot intervention confuses British Labour Leftists

NZPA-Reuter London Opposition Labour Leftists seeking to block the succession of the Right-winger, Denis Healey to the party leadership yesterday were in confusion over the intervention of the veteran leftwinger, Michael Foot in the election race.

Leftists and centre-Leftists among Labour members of Parliament found themselves torn three ways over their votes. They had three candidates to choose from, compared with the Rightists who had only one — the I .ner Finance Minister, Denis Healey. Mr Foot, aged 67, a fiery orator popular amongst trade unionists, Parliamentarians and party grassroots activists, will pose a formidable challenge to the Right’s champion, Mr Healey — but by throwing his hat into the leadership ring he will also dilute the mainly Leftist-inspired ?< stop Healey” campaign. Mr Foot said yesterday he would prefer his two fellow

centre-Left candidates, Mr I Peter Shore and Mr John i Silkin, to stand down, but ’ within minutes both declared that they, would fight on. Mr Foot had wavered for < days after -the retirement of the former Prime Minister, James Callaghan, last Wednesday before announcing his candidacy, on .MonHis move was greeted!

with delight yesterday by the Communist daily the “Morning Star.” It said Mr Foot would now become the standard-bearer of the predominantly Leftist party activists,

4 But Right-wing newspapers greeted his move with scorn. The “Financial Times” said Mr Foot had become p the poodle of the Left.”; Because of Mr Foot’s, wide appeal throughout- . the Labour Party, political analysts yesterday predicted that it was unlikely the election would be settled bn the first ballot, to be held on November 4. To win then, Mr Healey would have to secure more than half of all votes cast. But bookmakers yesterday were still making Mr. Healey odds-on favourite to win in the end — to face another leadership election, including! .trade unionists and Leftist local activists, next year. The vote is confined to the mainly Rightist Labour members of Parliaments

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19801022.2.60.12

Bibliographic details

Press, 22 October 1980, Page 9

Word Count
325

Foot intervention confuses British Labour Leftists Press, 22 October 1980, Page 9

Foot intervention confuses British Labour Leftists Press, 22 October 1980, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert