McPhail and Gadsby

Press, 14 July 1980, Page 16

McPhail and Gadsby

Sir, — One of the reasons given by the Broadcasting Corporation for the nonscreening of “Death of a Princess” was that it was an affront to the Muslim faith, and since New Zealand has 3000 Muslims, it may produce a contemptuous view of their faith. Why should the consideration of a small minority -group be instrumental in deciding not to screen a television'programme? is this consistent with the fact that the beliefs of a larger minority group, (Christians) do not affect the screenings of such satirical views on religion as are in the series “McPhail and Gadsby on . . . ”? Why should a group, larger than the Muslims, be subjected to this form of blasphemy? The screening examinations made by the Broadcasting Corporation need to be restructured to consider -any faith, including the Christian faith. — Yours, etc., A. J. McNEILL. July 11, 1980.

Sir, — How much will the people of New Zealand tolerate in the name of satire? Last night’s programme by McPhail and Gadsby was not satirical but blasphemous. It held religion and particularly Christianity up to open ridicule, deriding the foundations of the faith in a way which would not be tolerated if directed against, for example, Maori culture. In view of the decision to ban “Death of a Princess”- for reasons, among others, of possible offence to the religious sensibilities of Islamic people, the television authority is being inconsistent in screening last night’s programme. Dave Allan has been near the mark but this has gone too far. It was an insult both to Christians and to the viewing audience who are assumed to treat it as entertainment. — Yours etc. The Rev. D.R. CHRISTMAS. July 10, 1980.