Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Analysis ‘should be published’

An independent analysis of public submissions on the Johnson Report should have been published, the Family Planning Association’s Christchurch branch believes.

The Johnson Report is a study of the teaching in schools of human development and behaviour that was released in 1977, Public Comment was invited by the Government, and submissions made to the Minister of Education (Mr Wellington). These submissions were sent for analysis to Link Consultants. < The firm’s findings had been before the Minister since the beginning of the year, said the Family Planning Association. He had not made them public, however. “Instead, the public have been treated to. the Minister’s personal opinion on the likely outcome of

implementing some of the Johnson Committee’s recommendations, together with piecemeal reports of some of the figures provided by the Link analysis,” it said. The reports seemed to indicate the Government had made decisions that did not accord with the majority of views expressed in the public submissions. This was particularly so in.. relation to' introducing “humandevelopment and relationship courses” in schools. The association .regretted the Government’s decision not to support the introduction of sex education.

It believed the public had the right to see the full report and Link Consultant analysis so as to judge for itself the nature of the opposition and the support for these proposals.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800501.2.130

Bibliographic details

Press, 1 May 1980, Page 28

Word Count
222

Analysis ‘should be published’ Press, 1 May 1980, Page 28

Analysis ‘should be published’ Press, 1 May 1980, Page 28

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert