Springbok decision deferred
PA Wellington The New Zealand Rugby Football Union’s council has deferred further consideration of a proposed New Zealand tour by a South African team in 1981 until its next meet* ing, on June 6. The N.Z.R.F.U.’s chairman (Mr C. A. Blazey) said after a council meeting yesterday that in view of a resolution passed at the N.Z.R.F.U.’s annual meeting on Thursday that the council discuss the proposed tour urgently and form a policy as soon as possible, the council had discussed the matter yesterday. ... “It decided to consider all the matters relating to
it and the subject will be on the agenda for each subsequent meeting of council,” he said. Asked about the possible timing of an, invitation to the South African Rugby Board, Mr Blazey said that it could be left until the end of this year if necessary. Arrangements for the British Lions team for their tour of South Africa, which will begin next month, had been made less than five months before the tour had been scheduled to start. There had been no discussion by the council yesterday about the possibility of an alternative tour’s being arranged for
next year if the Springbok visit were cancelled. Asked about the compositiori of a Springbok team if it were invited, Mr Blazey said, “If we did issue an invitation for a South African team to come to New Zealand it would be for a merit-se-lected team. We would expect a mixed-race team to come.” Of an. April 9 letter to the council from the Minister of Foreign Affairs (Mr Taiboys), Mr Blazey said the council would not be in a position to make a substantive reply at least until after its next meeting. Asked whether he considered progress had being
made in recent years in overcoming racial segregation in South African sport, he said he could not outline all the deveb opments but he gave two examples. He referred to the South African Barbarians team which toured Britain last year. He said it had . included eight black, eight coloured, and eight white players. There was also multi-racial representation on South African selection panels. Mr Taiboys said last evening that the Government would not support a tour of New Zealand by a multi-racial South African team while the Gleneagles agreement remained.
“The Gleneagles agreement deals with apartheid,” he said. “That system continues to exist.” Mr Taiboys said that a multi-racial team which reflected multi-racial sport was one thing but a multiracial team that was “simply cosmetic” was something else. The Leader of the Opposition (Mr Rowling) yesterday congratulated Mr Taiboys on his stand. He said Mr Taiboys was to be commended for spelling out “so clearly and so firmly the vital issues and responsibilities at stake” Mr Don’s views: back page.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800419.2.11
Bibliographic details
Press, 19 April 1980, Page 1
Word Count
464Springbok decision deferred Press, 19 April 1980, Page 1
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.