Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

‘Patronising’ commentary

By

R. T. BRITTENDEN

New Zealand made a valiant attempt to win a place in the World Cup cricket final at Old Trafford yesterday, and there must have been some disappointed all-night listeners when the team lost to England by only nine runs. But the reaction among members of the cricket public, judging by comments heard yesterday and telephone calls, was not so much chagrin at the defeat as disenchantment

with what was described regularly as “the patronising attitude” of the radio commentators.

There was certainly no need to regard New Zealand as the country cousins of one-day cricket. New Zealand has a very reasonable record in this sophisticated sort of cricket.

In the last 10 years New Zealand sides have played 40 limited-over games for 25 victories and 12 losses — three matches were abandoned because of rain.

Some of the wins were against sides of modest talents but in six visits to Australia, in the prePacker days, New Zealand won the inter-state knockout contest three times and was in a further final. Even against the test countries, the record is a satisfactory one. There have been 21 such matches, for nine wins, nine losses, and those three unfinished games. Moreover, New Zealand provincial teams have had several successes

against full-strength touring teams. New Zealand was certainly not disgraced in the 1979 Prudential Cup contest. And it will be a source of unending delight to New Zealanders with Australian associations to recall that when the betting opened before the start of the series, New Zealand was quoted at 14 to 1 and Australia at the longer odds of 20 to 1. It may never happen again.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790622.2.83

Bibliographic details

Press, 22 June 1979, Page 20

Word Count
278

‘Patronising’ commentary Press, 22 June 1979, Page 20

‘Patronising’ commentary Press, 22 June 1979, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert