Underwear advertising
Sir, — In reply to M. Collins’s objection to male underwear advertising (November 15), I would like to know why he or she suddenly decides to disagree when the male “shows his anatomy.” For years we have had female underwear advertising thrust on us and there has been no hint of complaint. Why is the male advertising more objectionable than the female advertising? — Yours, etc., P. BENNETT. November 16, 1978.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19781120.2.131.6
Bibliographic details
Press, 20 November 1978, Page 20
Word Count
71Underwear advertising Press, 20 November 1978, Page 20
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in