Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Container work ‘not racket’

Watersiders are not racketeering on Sunday work at Lyttelton’s container terminal, says the terminal’s man-1 ager (Mr P. J. Morgan). Mr Morgan has objected to! comments by the retiring■ C resident of North Canter-; ury Federated Farmers (Mr P. G. Morrison) which he said implied that watersiders were “working a swifty” on | Sunday work which was i costing New Zealand thousands of dollars in extra! freight charges. Mr Morrison said last! week that on one occasion! watersiders deliberately! worked slowly on a Friday j to ensure that a container; vessel had to be worked on Sunday, then stepped up their work-rate so that they| finished on Saturday but still! got paid for Sunday — ad-1 ding $20,000 to the freight ■ bill. Mr Morgan said that the j bill for Sunday work was! not $20,000. It was between! $ll,OOO and $12,000. “Because we are a six-day facility we work Sunday only at the request of thej ship, and the decision has to i be made by 11 a.m. on Fri-|

■ day, not 4 p.m. as said byj ; Mr Morrison,” he said. jl "This is contained in the! national awa r d and is rea- < I sonable because watersiders, | i t like anyone else, expect a I certain amount of notice if|( j they have to change their i week-end plans.” 4 It Mr Morgan said it was 4 physically impossible forii imen at the terminal to vary! .! the work-rate to any sig-I t ’ nificant degree. !' | "This is a highly mecha- ' nised industry. The men may j work slowly but they cannot ■ < I speed up the work-rate —[s J there is too much machinery is ■involved for that,” Mr Mor-'I Jgan said. > Even if there was a good 1 • run and the men finished on < !I1 turday, they still turned t up on Sunday, he said. t ' “There is always work at .the terminal even if there is!' tij ship — such as handling ' boxes and washing contain- ' ! ers. This work all offsets the s ■(cost of employing a gang for ■ i Sunday and brings the final [coct to the ship to between js6ooo and $7OOO. "Of course, the ship gains: I the advantage of being | icleared a day earlier,” Mr! I Morgan said. 1 i

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19780531.2.72

Bibliographic details

Press, 31 May 1978, Page 7

Word Count
376

Container work ‘not racket’ Press, 31 May 1978, Page 7

Container work ‘not racket’ Press, 31 May 1978, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert