Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

City Council’s enrolment programme ‘a flop’

The Christchurch City Council’s enrolment programme was “an absolute flop,’’ said Labour’s Mayoral candidate (Mr Alex Clark) yesterday. The major part of the enrolment programme had

been left far too late and, on investigation, enrolment forms were not available at a suburban library and a local post office which carried sets of electoral rolls, Mr Clark said.

“I fail to see the sense of putting out the rolls without including the enrolment forms,” said Mr Clark. “If this is the best the council can do, it will not be enrolling many people.” The Town Clerk (Mr J. H. Gray) said that all households in the City of Christchurch would receive circulars with enrolment forms attached, in about 10 days. These would follow postcards — which were being sent out now — reminding voters already on the roll of the elections in October, and notifying unenrolled “voters” of the circulars and enrolment forms to follow.

’ It was a first attempt at ■ “saturation” enrolment, said « Mr Gray. The voting age had I been lowered to 18 only i weeks before the 1974 election, and the British-subject i requirement had been [ dropped.

This meant that there were a lot of people aged 21 to 23 and a new group aged 18 to 20 who might not “really be aware of their obligation to vote,” and that some aliens were now entitled to

enrol. Mr Gray said that the timing of the enrolment campaign was dictated by the statutory June 30 closing date for the main roll. Dispatch and delivery of the 103,000 post cards was taking about three weeks, and the circulars had to await completion of this. Mr Clark also said that the “pokey ads” in the newspapers were an inefficient use of ratepayers’ money. More prominent and less frequently placed advertisements were “a better use.” Ten small pithy advertisements were being placed,

asking "Are you on the roll?” Mr Gray said. Four larger ones had also been designed, three of which had yet to be placed. Mr Gray said that post offices were not required to provide facilities for enrolment for local-body elections. This explained the absence of enrolment forms there.

Some people also confused Parliamentary rolls with local-body rolls, Mr Gray said. Asked “Are you on the roll?” they immediately thought of the Parliamentary roll, he said.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770729.2.21

Bibliographic details

Press, 29 July 1977, Page 2

Word Count
391

City Council’s enrolment programme ‘a flop’ Press, 29 July 1977, Page 2

City Council’s enrolment programme ‘a flop’ Press, 29 July 1977, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert