Protecting soils
Sir, —Your leading article (July 5) urges that we must all be prepared to pay the cost of protecting good soil from urban expansion. We should also be prepared to pay more, if necessary, for such developments as hydroelectricity, if we can thus save good land. The shortsighted scheme in the upper Clutha Valley is being pressed forward on the uncertain grounds that it is the cheapest of several alternatives, and in spite of contrary recommendations from successive official investigations. The flooding of some of the most productive orchard land in the country could be avoided by.
the use of an alternative scheme. Even if it does cost more, we should be prepared to pay to save this asset, as well as out of consideration for the people, long established on that land, who could never be fully compensated for what they would lose. Only a few people far away? It may be ourselves next.—Yours, etc., JIM McCAHON July 5, 1977.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770707.2.120.4
Bibliographic details
Press, 7 July 1977, Page 16
Word Count
163Protecting soils Press, 7 July 1977, Page 16
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.