Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Monthly calls for some probationers

About 200 people on pro- ; bation in Christchurch are j under “nominal supervision,” reporting only once a month ; to their probation officers inI stead of the usual once a ; week. The 200, about 17 per cent 'of the probationers, were I selected by the probation [officers for their “special ’ treatment” because the offi- : cers are working to their I own formula of 45 cases a ! month, with eight court reports. Probation officers in other ; centres imposed a work limit I of 50 cases a month on Mon--1 day, but in Christchurch the action was taken on FebruI ary 14. It has been taken in I protest against what the I Public Service Association describes as “intolerable” ■ conditions. I The Christchurch probation [officers representative on the P.S.A, (Mr W. A. Parkhill) 'said yesterday that when the I formula was imposed Christ I church officers were suffering! [the worst conditions in the ; country, with only 11 officers I trying to cope with a case [ load which should have been i handled by 26, the full district complement. i He said that there were | now 17 Christchurch officers, I but eight of them were new and not “fully effective.” ByMay or June the service should be adequate, he said. I “The effect has been that

the probationers with whom, I we are dealing have been [getting a better deal,” he t said. At times in the pastj few years officers had been! [struggling to keep up with 90 I cases a month. Mr Parkhill said that the! ; morale of the Christchurch [ I officers had also improved. I The Christchurch officers ' imposed their own work con-| ditions after consulting the; .Public Service Association ! because they felt they could I not cope with heavy workl loads and do justice to the! probationers. Mr Parkhill said that the [reason why Christchurch; (officers were working to a!

case load of 45 while officers; in other centres had 50 cases! a month was that Christ-' church officers did more court duty. Mr Parkhill said that those on nominal supervision were carefully selected and their reporting times reduced onlyj after initial more regular re-; polling. He said that the probation service was now becoming more of a career. “The next step is to get an attractive salary to keep the people here.” he said. The' officers intended to keep to I the formula of 45 cases a month with eight court re-[ ports.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770223.2.48

Bibliographic details

Press, 23 February 1977, Page 6

Word Count
409

Monthly calls for some probationers Press, 23 February 1977, Page 6

Monthly calls for some probationers Press, 23 February 1977, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert