Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Cattish debate in Parliament

PA Wellington Parliament argued for 20 minutes yesterday afternoon about legal changes which at first —under the Labour Government —prohibited cats from shops, and subsequently—under National—allowed them in. During several fiery exchanges, Dr A. M. Finlay (Lab., Henderson) called the Government’s change in the regulations a “semantic taradiddle” and the Prime Minister (Mr Muldoon) labelled Sir Basil Arthur (Lab., Timaru) a “cat hater.” Dr Finlay said the original regulations prohibiting

cats in shops had been introduced by the Health Department at the urging of the World Health Organisation, which had given warning that animals, including cats, could carry diseases. He referred to promises made by Mr Muldoon during the election campaign last year that he would see that cats were allowed back in shops; Dr Finlay said he supposed that in the end the Health Department had to come up with something that pleased everyone, and the result was a piece of “semantic taradiddle.”

Cats were now let in shops “for such time as was reasonably necessary to suppress rodents.” Mr Muldoon said the former Minister of Health, (Mr McGuigan) was prepared to exclude cats from shops, but not from dwelling houses. “It is perfectly in order to have cats in your home, to have them in your bed, to have them climb all around the table from which you take your food, to have them in your kitchen, to have your children cuddle and kiss them . s . That is perfectly in order under a Labour Gov-

eminent, but it is not in order to have them in your shops for the purpose of catching rats and mice.” Sir Basil Arthur said no amount of waffling by the Prime Minister could cover the point that the Government was caught squarely on a broken promise. Mr R. W. Prebble (Lab., Auckland Central) said cats were allowed into shops only to chase rodents. That ruled out kittens and elderly cats. What sort of test could be applied to determine whether cats were able to chase rodents? he said. Opposition interjector: “A warrant of kitness.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19761020.2.9

Bibliographic details

Press, 20 October 1976, Page 1

Word Count
346

Cattish debate in Parliament Press, 20 October 1976, Page 1

Cattish debate in Parliament Press, 20 October 1976, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert