Letters to the Editor

Press, 14 September 1976, Page 20

Letters to the Editor

(1) Letters submitted for printing in this column must not exceed 150 words. They should be written in ink or preferably typed on one side of the paper. Ample space must be left in the margins and between lines for subediting marks. (2) Letters written over pen names or iniUals will not ordinarily be considered for publication, a legible signature and fuU postal address —not a P.O. Box numberare essential. (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere. The Editor does not undertake to acknowledge, hold, return or enter into correspondence on any letter not accepted for publication. E.C.—Too far from subject. R.J.L.—Too personal. M.M.—Repetitious

sents. Were he better informed about conditions in the Soviet Union he might show more concern for the lot of the mass of its people, in comparison with whom the supposedly capitalistridden British workers are wallowing in affluence. True, about 2 per cent of the Soviet population — the power elite who possess “blat” — enjoy opulent privileges. But the vast majority bears the brunt of an economy that is inefficient and corrupt. There is a perennial shortage of food and housing. Clothing is shoddy and quality goods are procurable only by the elite, who shop at special discount stores. The average worker is indifferent to his job and his productivity is very low. Alcoholism and absenteeism flourish.—Yours, etc., GRAHAM RHIND. September 13, 1976. Sir, —I was intrigued by Mrs Thatcher’s comments as reported by “The Press” (September 11). The hollowness of her re-