Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CONRAD IN PERSPECTIVE

Conrad; A Reassessment. By Douglas Hewitt. Bowes and Bowes. 142 pp. Notes, bibliography and index. N.Z. price $5.65. Many admirers of Conrad will be familiar with Douglas Hewitt’s fine pioneer study, which remains the best single account of Conrad’s principal novels and stories. Hewitt’s early value was in his distinction, between the good and the bad in Conrad; in his insistence that Conrad’s exotic settings were a means and not an end; and in his clear analysis of Conrad's most constant themes. This reissue of the 1952 book has a new preface and conclusion, and includes the long preface to the book’s 1968 second edition, which serves as a most interesting account of the means by which the literary critical process has attempted to abstract Conrad from recognition into obscuritv again. Mr Hewitt, for example, saw fit in 1952 to point out that the telegraph wire in

“Nostromo” signified something more than its literal self, as a means of contact between an isolated community and the outer world of commerce and change. Now he rightly protests at the critical tendency which can see the said wire “only as • a symbolic umbilical cord linking the womb-like mine with the town which has metaphorically issued from it but which, nevertheless, by the strange logic of archetypes, rests by the amniotic waters of mother sea.” Mr Hewitt’s study is refreshingly common-sense, and makes its judgments from demonstrably close readings of the texts, and of Conrad’s own scattered and contradictory observations on his art. Mr Hewitt’s claim for Conrad of a “body of work which makes all but a handful of other English novelists look superficial” is commonplace now. The virtue of this study lies in the fact that Mr Hewitt had, in 1952, to demonstrate it, and did so,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19750906.2.73.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33941, 6 September 1975, Page 10

Word Count
299

CONRAD IN PERSPECTIVE Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33941, 6 September 1975, Page 10

CONRAD IN PERSPECTIVE Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33941, 6 September 1975, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert