Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Reluctant backing for sugar beet

Support for an investigation into a South Island sugar beet industry was finally forthcoming from the Labour Party’s conference yesterday, reports Oliver Riddell.

But first Otago argued I that the industry should be based further south, and supporters of the Fijian sugar industry sharply criticised delegates for seeking to ruin sugar growers throughou the South Pacific. Mr N. Lambert, the Labour

candidate for the South Canterbury seat, said that a sugar beet industry was a big political issue in Mid and South Canterbury. “You will destroy the 5050 chance we have of winning this seat if you refect even the concept of urgent

i consideration of the fndus|try,” he said. New Zealand imported 40 per cent of its sugar from Australia, Mr Lambert said. He reminded delegates of the disadvantages New Zealand was under in N.A.F.T.A., and said that a South Island industry could replace this quantity of sugar from Australia.

The conference finally passed an amendment that “a sugar beet industry in the South Island be given urgent consideration and that the Government encourage it to be a co-operative enterprise.” But the original remit had called, as well, for “Government support” for the beet industry. Mr A. L. Srhoy (Ashburton) said he had reason to believe that the Government was not interested in a cooperative concern, and he found this surprising. “We are not going to stand for being treated over sugar beet the way business treats us over lucerne, where they decided what they want, when they want it, what they will pay the grower and when they will pay him,” fie said. But Mr M. D. J. Butler (Wellington Rubber Workers’ Union) said: “A beet industry in the South Island will do exactly to Fiji what we have been begging the E.E.C. and Britain not to do to us over butter.” Mr J. Shaw, of the South Pacific branch, said that a New Zealand sugar industry would lead to huge unemployment throughout the South Pacific. Then Otago had its say. Mrs G. Vine (Caversham) said eight years had been spent on research for a sugar beet industry in South or Central Otago, and that it was bv no means a foregone conclusion that Mid or South Canterbury would get one.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19750514.2.17

Bibliographic details

Press, Issue 33842, 14 May 1975, Page 2

Word Count
378

Reluctant backing for sugar beet Press, Issue 33842, 14 May 1975, Page 2

Reluctant backing for sugar beet Press, Issue 33842, 14 May 1975, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert