Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Saturday coiffure

(AZ. Press Association) ■ WELLINGTON, Oct IL The Industrial Court has ruled in favour of ! the defendant in a test case relating to work : done in women's hairdressing salons on a Saturday morning. ■ The Wellington Shop. (Assistants’ Union had sought! ($2OO from Linda Kaye Boutique. Lower Hutt, as a pen-! alty for a breach of the New, Zealand (except North Auck- j land) ladies’ hairdressers award. The award says that the occupier of any shop may open for not more than four hours before 1 p.m. on Sati urday.s to do hairdressing 1 for weddings, balls, and similar special occasions Which cannot be conveniently ser-

ivrced during normal working hours. In his decision, Judge R. D. Jamieson said the three ; words “.similar special occaqsion” were extremely difficult to construe. The standard of the occasion itself must be looked at first, he said. It was not in-! tended to cover a gathering: of friends or neighbours in a private house. i( “It is plain that it must! /also be of such a kind that a( ■reasonable woman might; ■ justifiably feel that it was! 'mot convenient to have her; • hair done on a Friday or i earlier,” Judge Jamieson said. ■ “As mere males we incline ■ to the view that much • would depend on this point, • on the nature of the hairdo, ; and on the particular hair ■ concerned.” The words in the award ■ proved to be difficult to|

; interpret and apply. “The award will no doubt be due for renewal before ; long, and we suggest that attention be paid then to his

particular sub-clause, and an effort made to substitute a clearer form of wording for that now appearing,” he said. The Court ruled in favour of the defendant, and the question of costs was ireserved.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19741015.2.34

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33665, 15 October 1974, Page 3

Word Count
294

Saturday coiffure Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33665, 15 October 1974, Page 3

Saturday coiffure Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33665, 15 October 1974, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert