Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Meat proposal frightening’

(New Zealand Press Association)

DUNEDIN, May 6.

The announcement that the Government might react favourably to the Meat Board’s request for power to enable it to trade in beef was frightening news for all independent and self-reliant producers, the executive director of the Sheep and Cattlemen’s Association (Mr A. D. Dick) said in a statement today.

"Regrettably, the board has yielded to pressure from Federated Farmers, which does not speak for the majority of producers — as was proved just 18 months ago by the referendum on wool acquisition,” Mr Dick said. “The federation once again is attempting to sell the pastoralist down the drain without first seeking farmer opinion. Last year it was wool, today it is meat.” Mr Dick said the Meat Board was not geared for trading in beef, and it was impossible for the board to influence the price of beef, which was set by world market demands.

By entering the market as a trader, the board would create a monopoly at the ex-

pense of healthy competition between the meat companies.

“Bureaucratic control of a commodity has never yet proved to be efficient economic control,” Mr Dick said. “If the Government unwisely grants the board the power it is asking for, without first seeking the opinion of all producers, a rift will be created within the industry when all efforts should be united and directed towards promotion of New Zealand beef on the markets of the world.” The setting of a realistic floor price, to be financed from the board’s accumulated funds, would be a more acceptable approach to rhe problem than the drastic step of acquiring all beef.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19740507.2.22

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33527, 7 May 1974, Page 2

Word Count
276

Meat proposal frightening’ Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33527, 7 May 1974, Page 2

Meat proposal frightening’ Press, Volume CXIV, Issue 33527, 7 May 1974, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert