Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Liquor advertising

Sir, —If cigarette advertising is to be restricted why not drink advertising also?; Have warnings cut down the innocent pedestrian death' rate? Cigarettes, if they do,] kill only the individual smoker. Drink kills the innocent while the drinker escapes. I have yet to read of cigarettes being blamed by ! the accused for being the ; cause of murder, bashings, ’ robbery, rape, pedestrian deaths, home-wrecking, etc. But daily these crimes are blamed on drink by the accused, while alcoholics increase, yet the Government, urges increased drinking hours so that gluttony by a few can continue on a Sunday, making even that day a driving and pedestrian risk. It does not make sense.— Yours, etc., SMOKER’S PARADISE. March 23, 1973.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19730324.2.116.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXIII, Issue 38183, 24 March 1973, Page 14

Word Count
119

Liquor advertising Press, Volume CXIII, Issue 38183, 24 March 1973, Page 14

Liquor advertising Press, Volume CXIII, Issue 38183, 24 March 1973, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert