Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REINSTATEMENT MOVE FAILS

(N.Z. Press Association) WELLINGTON, Nov. 20. The Chairman of Committees Mr A. E. Allen, declined | to accept an amendment moved in Parliament by Mr R. P. Drayton (Lab., St Albans), under which a Christchurch City Councillor, Mr P. J. R. Skellerup, would have been deemed never to have been disqualified from the council. The Opposition tried to use the Local Legislation Bill —a bill containing miscellaneous provisions relating to iocal government—to bring about the reinstatement of Mr Skellerup, who lost his seat recently on instructions from the Audit Office. Opposition members of Parliament said they did not deny that the Audit Office acted correctly, in that contracts between the Christchurch City Council and Mr Skellerup’s firm had exceeded the stipulated maximum without prior approval. Mr Drayton described Mr

Skellerup as “an outstanding Christchurch citizen,” and “an outi standing councillor.” , The amendment was sup- , ported by Mr B. G. Barclay (Lab., Christchurch ' Central), Mr T. M. Mc- , Guigan (Lab v Lyttelton), and by the Leader of the Opposition (Mr Kirk), who stressed that Labour : Party support was being given in spite of the fact that Mr Skellerup was not; a member of the Labour Party. Mr Kirk said Mr Skellerup had lost his seat “simply on a technicality,’’ and had been “harshly and un- . justly treated through no fault of his own.” But Mr Allen, declined to accept the amendment after some discussion about its admissability under Parliamentary Standing Orders. The Minister of Local Government (Mr Seath) said there had been four other cases this year. The “automatic disqualification of Mr Skellerup did; not differ from any of the I other cases.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19701121.2.34

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CX, Issue 32460, 21 November 1970, Page 3

Word Count
274

REINSTATEMENT MOVE FAILS Press, Volume CX, Issue 32460, 21 November 1970, Page 3

REINSTATEMENT MOVE FAILS Press, Volume CX, Issue 32460, 21 November 1970, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert