Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

d> Letters to De considered tor this column must hot excoed 150 words They should be on only' one side of the paper: preferably typewrit ten. otherwise clearly writ ten in ink: and ample margins and space between lines should be left tor convenience tn sub editing. (2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. box number are required whether these are to be printed or not.

<s> The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or Is to be submitted elsewhere

<4> The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accep ted for printing; nor does he undertake to acknow ledge or enter into corres pondence concerning leiiera. although an acknowledge mont will be made where this seems to bo necessary or helpful <5l As a general rule correspondence on news Items In other publications, or carried on radio and television. is not acceptable The Walrus.—Not open. M. O'Neill.—Yes. B. J. Glen.—Prose preferred. Past and Present.—Not now open. Burn Hockey.—Correspondence on Vietnam not now open. A.W.B.—Not while the Arbitration Court Is considering claims. Hagley Car Park and Disillusioned.—See reply to "By Example.” Ratepayer.—You raise legal questions which cannot be canvassed here. Why not inquire from the council? Ends Meet, —A Royal commission is now examining the . whole social security system. Disgusted Citixen.—Provided he has the backing of bis council it is neither out of order nor unprecedented.

Interested.—The system has been widely publicised in the news media. You can obtain brochures from the Post Office. A Little Hurry Up.—ln a criminal court responsibility for the offence by a particular person would have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

By Example.—You make assumptions about the law; but this is what the argument is about. It might yet have to be tested tn the courts. Concerned.—The N.Z.B.C. has to provide services for the majority of listeners, not the minority who, through unusual circumstances, listen continuously. These are bound to hear a certain amount of repetition. , You could write to the N.Z.B.C. direct.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19700825.2.117

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CX, Issue 32384, 25 August 1970, Page 16

Word Count
338

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Press, Volume CX, Issue 32384, 25 August 1970, Page 16

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Press, Volume CX, Issue 32384, 25 August 1970, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert