LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CX, Issue 32351, 17 July 1970, Page 12

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letters to be considered tor this column must not exceed ISO words They should be on only one side of the paper: preferably typewritten. otherwise clearly written tn Ink: and ample margins and space between lines should be left for convenience In sub editing. <3l A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. box number are required, whether these are to be printed or not. <»> The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere 14) The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accepted for printing: nor does he undertake to acknowledge or enter into correspondence concerning letters, although an acknowledgement will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful. <5) As a general rule correspondence on news items In other publications, or carried on radio and television, is not acceptable. Übique.—Not now open. Robert Baker.—Correspondence on Vietnam not now open. Patrick Neary.—No space for another discussion of air pollution just now. Time For Action.—Hardly a line that would be supported by many. Love One Another.—lt was all said, repeatedly, during our recent correspondence on Ulster. Bravo—No space for a general discussion. The letter was accepted as illustrating a particular point. Ned Kay.—Why "bias”? Is anyone who does not share your opinion necessarily biassed and incompetent? The Innocent Always Reply.— There is some justice on both sides of this question. Your solution might be appropriate in some circumstances but not in others. W. B. Clarkson.—No doubt they would reply that their costs have increased proportionately. Federated Farmers do not appear to Lave found any reason to complain.