Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TV Ban “Nonsensical”

“Nonsensical,” and “a head in the sand attitude” were two of the comments made by members of the management committee of the Canterbury Rugby Union last evening on the New Zealand union’s refusal to sanction a live telecast of the annual match between Christ’s College and Christchurch Boys’ High School, at St raven Road today.

The national body’s executive turned down a proposal to televise the game because of a, clash with the North Otago- South Canterbury match at Oamaru this afternoon. Oamaru is deemed to be in the CHTV3 viewing area as w'ell as in that of DNTV2. The union’s policy is not to allow the televising of an inter-school match if there is a representative game in the viewing area being played at the same time. A similar situation arose last year, when a game was played at Oamaru on the same afternoon of the SchoolCollege match. The headmaster of Boys’ High School (Mr C. F. S. Caldwell) has protested to the New Zealand union about its decision, and last evening the Canterbury management committee decided to throw its weight behind Mr Caldwell. Mr Caldwell, in his lettei, said it was ridiculous for the New Zealand body to hold I

that the School-College game conflicted with a game in Oamaru. A big number of old boys of both schools was interested in the game, but would be unable to attend. Mr Caldwell made a formal request for the union to reconsider its ruling. Although it was probably too late to do anything about this year’s game, it was hoped that the decision would be reversed In 1971.

Mr C. H. J. Rhodes asked if it was possible for the schools to arrange the game on a different day of the week, such as a Tuesday or a Thursday. “There has been a terrific

amount of complaints about this, and a lot of people are of the opinion that the Canterbury union, as well as the New Zealand union, is in favour of not having the game televised,” Mr M. R. Barnett said.

Mr B. J. Drake recalled that the Canterbury union had suggested the New Zealand body should set a specific radius as the “viewing area.” The School-College match was a classic inter-school fixture in the country, and there were many factors in favour of its being televised. “I think we should peg away until we get somewhere,” he said.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19700715.2.17

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CX, Issue 32349, 15 July 1970, Page 1

Word Count
405

TV Ban “Nonsensical” Press, Volume CX, Issue 32349, 15 July 1970, Page 1

TV Ban “Nonsensical” Press, Volume CX, Issue 32349, 15 July 1970, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert