Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Advice On Irrigation Investment

Dr R. W. M. Johnson, principal research economist of the Agricultural Economics Research Unit at Lincoln College, concludes that investment in irrigation is likely to follow similar patterns in profitability to those of other forms of large-scale and on-farm investments in agriculture.

He- said in submissions to the irrigation committee of the Water Allocation Council yesterday that a general result of work done at the college in recent years had shown that the rate of return on large-scale agricultural development schemes had been consistently lower than the result in “on farm - ’ development A recent analysis of 60 blocks developed since the war by the Lands and Survey Department showed that the rate of return on average was only 1.8 per cent For “on-farm” development raising the productive capacity of land within an existing farm unit, Dr Johnson quoted figures showing returns ranging from 8.7 per cent to 28.5 per cent These results, he said, all showed that where existing farmers went in for pasture improvement alone the rate of return on extra capital investment was generally high. The evidence available for top-flight farmers who had already reached full potential before applying irrigation water indicated rates of return to capital investment of 25 per cent or more.

Fanners of average managerial ability would also get a fairly high return on irrigation investment of say 10 to 20 per cent, but it had to be remembered that they ought to be able to get such a return from pasture development alone. A careful evaluation of irrigation proposals was required to ascertain whether irrigation had greater merit than other new forms of agricultural technology on the individual farm. Dr Johnson said that the committee should investigate further the apparent contradiction between the national interest and the individual interest so as to frame appropriate terms of reference for profitability assessments of irrigation schemes.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19700407.2.110

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32265, 7 April 1970, Page 14

Word Count
313

Advice On Irrigation Investment Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32265, 7 April 1970, Page 14

Advice On Irrigation Investment Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32265, 7 April 1970, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert