LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32127, 24 October 1969, Page 10

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letters sent to the Editor for printing should preferably be typed, otherwise they must be written in ink on one side of the paper only. A legible signature and full address are required whether these are to be published or not. A P.O. box number is not a sufficient address. (2> Writers must say clearly whether or not their letters are being or have been 1 sent to other papers. | <3) The Editor cannot return or keep any letter which for any reason is unsuitable for printing; nor can he acknowledge unsuitable letters. although this will be done where it seems to be needful, or enter into any i correspondence. i<4) Letters must not be of more than 150 words. IA Pool-Lover.—See rules above. Jocelyn Perry.—Not all are so fortunate. !P. Harding.—Short of asking each councillor, we cannot. IH. Holm.—We were not aware that the exclusion of the public is proposed. Elucidation needed. Rough Track.—Having made his ■ point does he have to go so far as to boycott the meeting? J. Scullion.—We doubt whether any useful purpose would be served by discussing Mr Besant’i differences with his parish. Social’Economist.—Social Credit policy has been well aired in the correspondence on •paper gold.” It can be reopened during the election campaign.