Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INTER-CLUB HOCKEY University In Winning Form

University continued its good form when it beat High School Old Boys, 5-0. in the second round of senior men's hockey matches played at the Polo Grounds yesterday. Results were: University S, Old Boys 0. Selwyn 3, Linwood 0.8. 2. Harewood 3, Sydenham. 2. Hailey 0.8. 4, Woolston 1. UNIVERSITY V. OLO BOYS For many years Old Boys and University have been keen rivals In senior hockey and their matches have produced some brilliant hockey. Yesterday’s was no exception, but the surprising feature was the margin of victory: one of the highest in the games between these two teams. University, with its welldrilled forward line and intelligent defence, controlled the match, but Old Boys deserved better than a 5-0 loss. Their dogged defence repelled many of the swift University attacks, but the ekiWul ball con-

I trol and short passing of the I University forwards posed too I many problems. r M. Thomson (right-wing) had > an excellent game for University. His ball control, stickwork and positional play contributed much to University’s win. The inside-forwards, J. Christenson, B. Malster and J. Barren, combined well and were a constant threat to the Old Boys defence. I But the outstanding player i was the University centre-half, I S. Maister. His cool and skllI ful control of play, his accurate ■ distribution, and his efficiency t at blunting the Old Boys’ attacks, made him the key Hgure s In university’s win. i Old Boys were by no means disgraced, for they played some • excellent hockey, but they - could not match the skilled s combination of University. I T. Wall tackled expertly, and J. Marshall was an active I centre-half who did his best - to stem the tide of the Uni- • versity attacks.

_ SELWYH V. LINWOOD 0.8. "selwyn was better organised, both on attack and defence, and the relatively inexperienced Linwood team, although trying to play attacking hockey, too often fell down on fundamentals. A. Waters, at inside-right, played particularly well for Selwyn; his passing and stickwork were an important factor In his team’s win. HAREWOOD v. SYDENHAM Sydenham showed surprising resistance at the start of the match when Harewood’s passing was uncontrolled. But once Harewood settled down it dominated the match, having much the better cohesion between its forwards and halves. HADLEY 0.8. V. WOOLSTON Woolston was unlucky In the early stages when two goals were disallowed, but after that brief flutter Hagley took charge, and its more positive play gained it an easy win.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19680426.2.131

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31663, 26 April 1968, Page 14

Word Count
416

INTER-CLUB HOCKEY University In Winning Form Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31663, 26 April 1968, Page 14

INTER-CLUB HOCKEY University In Winning Form Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31663, 26 April 1968, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert