Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Ugly Aspects Criticised

Ugly aspects of Christchurch criticised at this week’s meeting of the Christchurch Civic Trust Board included a “positively hideous little shed’’ on the Avon River side of the Chamber of Commerce building, the city’s trash cans on public view at week-ends, and the “despoliation” through the removal of trees to make way for business premises.

Mrs H. L. Garrett said that when taking part in a river walk during the Pan Pacific Arts Festival, she had been disappointed to see “a horrible little shed'* at the pretiest part of the river bank near fioral displays. “It was quite out of keeping with the style of the Chamber of Commerce and to make It worse there were garbage cans there,” she added. Members said that this was a historic spot and one of the first places to be inhabited in Christchurch. It was agreed that Mrs Garrett should discuss the matter with the City Council, which, it was stated, owned the building.

Mr I. G. B. Wilson suggested a change in inner city rubbish collection which would obviate the necessity for leaving tins on the footpath over the week-ends. “If we have a little pride in our city, surely we can rearrange our trash so it is out of sight at this time.” he said. "Terrible, a disgrace.” murmured members. It was recalled the trust had written to the council on the same subject in 1966; an informal approach was decided on. Criticism of the removal of trees to make way for parking lots and factories was made by the chairman (Mr John Oakley) during discus-

sion of a plan to organise a seminar on trees.

“The city is slowly being despoiled,” he said. “Much is done thoughtlessly and trees are replaced by rock gardens or something tattylike that.’’

In the United States, the despoliation of frontages was not allowed by law. “I would like to see this enforced in Christchurch, but it would be much better if it could be achieved voluntarily,” Mr Oakley said.

Members wanted the seminar on trees which would cover all aspects of trees and their care. It was suggested that all local bodies in Canterbury be invited to send representatives.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19680424.2.112

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31662, 24 April 1968, Page 14

Word Count
368

Ugly Aspects Criticised Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31662, 24 April 1968, Page 14

Ugly Aspects Criticised Press, Volume CVIII, Issue 31662, 24 April 1968, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert