Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Pref. Tariff Attacked

(New Zealand Press Association)

AUCKLAND, October 30.

High Customs duties prevent New Zealand from buying from many countries that are, or could be, good customers for our farm products, the chairman of Motor Specialties, Ltd, (Mi* J. F. Johnston) said at the annual meeting of shareholders.

It could be assumed that the United Kingdom would eventually join the Common Market, with disastrous results for New Zealand exports. Yet, automotive parts from Commonwealth countries at-

traded 20 per cent duty, whereas those from Japan, the United States and other "most-favoured-nation” countries were subject to a 55 per cent duty. This differentiation was an almost insuperable barrier in trade, causing a great deal of antagonism toward New Zealand, Mr Johnston said.

He also advocated longterm protection of local automotive industry through tariffs rather than import controls. General Tariff He said it was not generally possible to contemplate manufacturing in New Zealand at prices comparable with overseas countries, because New Zealand did not enjoy the advantages of mass production. Local consumption was relatively limited and the range was very extensive because of the many models of vehicles that were here in limited numbers. This necessitated a more realistic system of Customs tariffs. With the advent of the steel industry, encouragement would have to be given to industries that were consumers of steel. No industry offered a better potential than the motor industry, said Mr Johnston. For this reason a greater measure of tariff protection should be offered, even if prices were materially higher than import costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19671031.2.162.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31514, 31 October 1967, Page 21

Word Count
256

Pref. Tariff Attacked Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31514, 31 October 1967, Page 21

Pref. Tariff Attacked Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31514, 31 October 1967, Page 21

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert