Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Trade-in Not Necessary

The car dealer, not his supplier, may require a trade-in before selling a new car. The dealer who insists on overseas funds before selling a customer a new car is also acting on his own initiative —not on instructions from the companies which supply new cars.

These conclusions have been reached by the Consumers’ Institute, which wrote to six motor companies supplying most of the new cars In New Zealand, after reports that some car dealers were insisting that they were unable to supply a new car unless a trade-in ■ or overseas funds, or both, were provided by the intending purchaser. The six companies all disclaimed having given any such directive to their dealers, the magazine "Consumer” reports in its latest The Ford Motor Company

replied: “On-no occasion has our company-endeavoured, by directive or other means, to influence retail dealers to require that a used vehicle be traded-in as-a prerequisite to a new car being supplied. Our company has no shareholding or other financial interest in any dealership in New Zea-

land, each being an individual business operating under its own management in serving the particular area in which it is located.” Dominion Motors said: “... We can assure that no such directive as that mentioned by you has been issued io its dealers by this company. The individual dealers are fully independent and, if they wish to do so, are quite free to sell on a ‘first come, first served, no strings’ basis.” General Motors and Austin Distributors’ Federation, in their replies, deny that any direction to sell new cars only if a trade-in is offered or overseas funds made available has been made to their franchise holders. Both say that because of reduced basic import licences, every car

ordered in on overseas funds reduced by one the number of claimants for cars which became available under basic import licence and represented additional business. Volkswagen Motors replied that the allocation of -new vehicles supplied to dealers was left entirely to the dealers’ own good judgment. Todd Motors: “ we do

not sell can to the public but to appointed dealers who are independently owned. We have no financial interest in any company selling retail the cars which we import and distribute. “Dealers must decide their own policy regarding the offer for sale of can .purchased from us, this being their stock in trade. In making this decision, dealers can be influenced by the difficulty in obtaining enough new stock to cover overheads and in maintaining full employment within their organisations. However, as stated, this is a matter for the individual dealer, as we have no rights nor authority to direct a dealer’s selling policy.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19670804.2.6

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31439, 4 August 1967, Page 1

Word Count
446

Trade-in Not Necessary Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31439, 4 August 1967, Page 1

Trade-in Not Necessary Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31439, 4 August 1967, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert