Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CASHIN QUAY

Discussion On Alarm System i There had been recommendations to the Lyttelton Harbour Board on fire protection for the transit sheds at Cashin quay, but the board was entitled to make its own decision on its own land, the Chief Fire Officer (Mr L, R. Osmond) told the Christchurch Metropolitan Fire Board. Harbour Board engineers had suggested that a sprinkler system would cause too much water damage, he said. “We impressed upon them that sprinklers only cause water damage in relation to the sprinkler heads that are actuated, but they went ahead and made their decision.” Mr F. G. McKechnie said he believed the Fire Underwriters’ Association had refuted a suggestion that sprinkler systems were not widely used in similar transit sheds overseas.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19661014.2.73

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31190, 14 October 1966, Page 7

Word Count
125

CASHIN QUAY Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31190, 14 October 1966, Page 7

CASHIN QUAY Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31190, 14 October 1966, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert