Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Irrigation Charges

Sir, —Mr Logan is correct in stating that a contract for £5O would rise to £3OO if the new irrigation charges are adopted. But he, like others, tells only half the story. The old contracts gave a cover of an acre-foot over half your land, while the new rates give an acre-foot over your whole farm. A farmer with his farm developed would use this amount of water and in a dry year considerably more. I am well aware of the costs involved but would remind Mr Logan that on the Ashbur-ton-Lyndhurst scheme we have had 18 years to spread this development. I am not one of those trying to have the taxpayer pay for the benefits I derive from irrigation.— Yours, etc., IRRIGATOR. June 18, 1966.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660622.2.109.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31092, 22 June 1966, Page 12

Word Count
129

Irrigation Charges Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31092, 22 June 1966, Page 12

Irrigation Charges Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31092, 22 June 1966, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert