Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

£335 THEFT

Nine Months’ Gaol

Gerald Raymond Augustine Wall, aged 39, a contractor, was sentenced by Mr Justice Macarthur in the Supreme Court yesterday to nine months’ gaol on a charge of stealing £335 Os sd, by failing to account, from Nu-Way Dry Cleaners. Ltd.

His Honour said the method of theft was clever, and the prisoner was, ih effect, in a position of trust. The prisoner’s previous offence of dishonesty happened so long ago when he was such a young man that he regarded the prisoner to all in'ents and purposes as a first offender.

He could not possibly accede to counsel's request for a monetary penalty, said his Honour. The sentence haa not only to be a deterrent on the prisoner but also on persons who might be minded to commit similar crimes. SnbmMona For Wall, Mr D. H. Hicks said that apart from two offences committed nearly 20 years ago, the prisoner had lived a hard-working, honest life. No fewer than three former employers gave him excellent references and two of them declared they would give the prisoner a job again tomorrow. The prisoner had made complete restitution for the amount he was convicted of stealing from the company. In fact, he had paid £lOOO,

and a writ had been issued to recover some of that from the company as it was more than the prisoner had been convicted of stealing. Mr Hicks said. Counsel submitted that the company had been to some extent negligent in not keeping adequate checks on its accounting system. His Honour said that even conceding this, and "he was by no means accepting the submission, the difficulty lay in the jury's finding that the prisoner intended to steal by his employment of a skillful means of avoiding the accountancy system of the company.

Mr Hicks submitted that a' heavy monetary penalty; would be a fit punishment. The prisoner would be forced to borrow on his new home. If the Court considered a prison term necessary, counsel submitted it should be a short one in view of the prisoner’s family circumstances and his industry as a worker. 1

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19610526.2.179

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume C, Issue 29523, 26 May 1961, Page 16

Word Count
355

£335 THEFT Press, Volume C, Issue 29523, 26 May 1961, Page 16

£335 THEFT Press, Volume C, Issue 29523, 26 May 1961, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert