Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Union Talks Today On Freezing Works Issue

(New Zealand Press Association) WELLINGTON, June 6. The national executive of the Federation of Labour, and representatives of the freezing workers, watersiders, railwaymen, and drivers will meet in Wellington tomorrow morning to consider action to be taken in the present dispute in the freezing industry. The freezing companies have offered to backdate the partial settlement agreed on in conciliation 10 days ago—mainly the incorporation of the 24 per cent, general wage order in basic rates—to May 1. This is the date the Arbitration Court decided recently on which a new award should begin. The employers want the settlement to provide a June 30, 1961, expiry’ date for the new award.

The workers want pay to be retrospective to February 8, the date on which the dispute about incorporation first went to the Court.

The unions claimed they had such an understanding with the companies but the employers reject this, saying the understanding was for retrospective pay only if the Court granted a change in the award. The Court merely shortened the date of the expiry of the award by two months, and the actual incorporation was decided on only in conciliation.

The employers are prepared to let Mr S. W. Armstrong, the Conciliation Commissioner, who presided at last week’s compulsory conference, decide a compromise

date, provided the workers agree to signing the amended partial settlement and forthwith allow the documents to be lodged with the Clerk of Awards. This would mean that claims by the employers rejected in conciliation by the workers could go to the Court for hearing. There is no indication that the workers’ representatives will accept the employers’ offer. The delegates meeting with the executive of the Federation of Labour represent unions which would be involved if the offer is rejected and the freezing workers decide to continue with their plans for a “no-load-out” ban on carcases.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19600607.2.129

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29224, 7 June 1960, Page 14

Word Count
317

Union Talks Today On Freezing Works Issue Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29224, 7 June 1960, Page 14

Union Talks Today On Freezing Works Issue Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29224, 7 June 1960, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert