Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOCIETY OF ARTS

Annual Autumn Exhibition

There are several notable absentees from this year’s autumn exhibition of the Canterbury Society of Arts and, as a result, it cannot be said the exhibition as a whole is particularly interesting. Nor, unfortunately, can it be said that there are any outstanding individual works.

However, there are several paintings in the northern gallery which are interesting. Juliet Peter has turned to egg tempera for her “Suburb, Wellington,” which is a characteristically witty pattern. The medium suits her rather severe style very well. She has used a looser style in some water colours, but they have not the same assurance.

Quentin Macfarlane’s “Christ in the Wilderness” shows a considerable advance in the use of colour since he painted “Deposition” which is in the McDougall Art Gallery. His “Grey Movement” and “Auckland Painting—Red” are clever essays in the use of a single colour, although the latter is hung so that it is impossible to «et a complete impression and it seems to lack coherence. His “Portrait With Background” is just that: a portrait and a background with no relation between the two. Nevertheless his work shows him to be one of the most promising of the city’s younger painters.

Julien Royds, another young painter, clearly has some ability as a colourist, as her “Gold Sun” shows. But she lapses too often into using a palette knife to obtain easy textural effects. A. S. Holcroft's oils are not as accomplished as his watercolours, although the best of them, “Ferrymead, Heathcote.” is reminiscent in colour and form of the paintings of M. T. Woolaston and has some of the same virtues.

Doris Lusk’s only painting in the show is painted more strongly and broadly than most of her work. There are some subtle colour modulations in it, but the design is not sustained throughout.—J.N.K.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19590413.2.50

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCVIII, Issue 28868, 13 April 1959, Page 7

Word Count
307

SOCIETY OF ARTS Press, Volume XCVIII, Issue 28868, 13 April 1959, Page 7

SOCIETY OF ARTS Press, Volume XCVIII, Issue 28868, 13 April 1959, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert