Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Fluoridation

“ a Sir,—Your recent editorial on ’ fluoridation appears to decry the 1 consequences of democratic.free- ' dom which permits' sections of , people ,to oppose this dictatorial r measure of mass medication. You ' refer to democratic safeguards, - which are non-existent when the 1 community water supply is poli luted with sodium fluoride, a bye product of aluminium. As a rate"i payer I expect the council to n honour its contract to supply me - with pure water, failing which I will be forced to proceed for the a supply of a pump, free of charge. >, Are you still-prepared to support d the dictatorial demands of the i- bureaucratic pseudo - scientist! i- against the 11,000-signature petln tion to Parliament, anti-fluorida-tion branches all over the country ■t and the opposition of the New (j Zealand Housewives’ Association as well as widespread individual disfavour? I see sodium fluoride ■ is now off the list of dangerous • drugs, and chemists may sell 11 with a warning as to its effects.— 1S Yours, etc., d W.J.C. 'f September 25, 1958.

"Sir, —By regretting that individual liberty permits a "vocal minority” to prevent the mass fluoridation of our water, ‘‘The Press” brings into sharp relief the real issue—personal freedom. I have taken no part in this controversy, and I know little about the use of fluoride except that its exponents say it will benefit only that small —and doubtless, vocal—minority under twelve years old; but I think it should be observed that the exponents of fluoridation seem a small minority, too, even if "The Press” does place their views before a large majority. Our freedoms, which "The Press” may not respect, were won in the tears and blood of countless Britons, over many centuries. Must they be abolished? I understand that doses of fluoride may be safely arranged for those who want it.—Yours, etc..

FAIR DINKUM. September 23, 1958.

[We did not regret the freedom for a "vocal minority” to state its view; we do regret that the minority is misguided.—Ed., "The Press.”] A <

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19580927.2.7.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28702, 27 September 1958, Page 3

Word Count
334

Fluoridation Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28702, 27 September 1958, Page 3

Fluoridation Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28702, 27 September 1958, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert