Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRIBUNAL’S REPORT

No “Leak" About Bank Rate

LONDON, January 21.

An official tribunal today swept away rumours that Britain's decision last year to raise the bank rate by 2 per cent, was improperly "leaked” in advance. A 20.000-word report by the three-man inquiry completely vindicates Government ministers. Conservative Party officials. Bank of England directors, and journalists involved in the allegations: The report said:. “We have unhesitatingly reached the unanimous conclusion that there is no justification for allegations that information about the raising of the bank rate was improperly disclosed to any person.”

The main findings in the report submitted to Parliament today, included the following:

In briefing journalists, trade union officials and Conservative Party officials about financial measures he proposed, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr Petter Thorneycroft) gave no hint Of the bank rate change.

Mr Oliver Poole, deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, whose name was mentioned during House of Commons questions, was not told in advance of the bank rate rise. There was “no shred of evidence" that he made any disclosure about the bank rate or other measures to any person connected with the companies with which he is associated, or that he made use of any such information for private gain. Lord Kindersley and Mr William Johnston Keswick, two Bank of England directors connected with firms which sold gilt-edged securities on the eve of the bank rate rise, were both described as having acted “with complete honesty and propriety.” The tribunal found that neither, intentionally or unintentionally; had disclosed any information suggesting the bank rate was to be raised or had made use of such information for private gain. Journalists and others who had been told In advance about the proposed financial measures but not the bank rate treated the information properly.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19580123.2.91

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28492, 23 January 1958, Page 11

Word Count
298

TRIBUNAL’S REPORT Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28492, 23 January 1958, Page 11

TRIBUNAL’S REPORT Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28492, 23 January 1958, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert