Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Promise Unredeemed

The Land and Income Tax Bill introduced in Parliament yesterday is very much what had been forecast in the Government’s election policy—save in one important particular. The Labour Party’s objectionable proposal to collect immediately an extra year’s social security tax from the self-employed had one redeeming feature in its unequivocal promise that ** a special tribunal “ will be set up and empowered “ to remit social security tax on “ income earned during this * financial year to persons who “ can prove that they have “ already paid the equivalent of “ this tax ”. The bill now before Parliament provides for no such tribunal. Thus an election promise has been broken within weeks of the election. It is true that the Minister of Finance (Mr Nordmeyer), replying to Opposition questions, said that when P.A.Y.E. was in

operation the Government would introduce proposals for setting up a tribunal to deal with hardship or double payments. This is not good enough. A tribunal to deal with a special anomaly was promised; and the time to set it up is when the anomaly is created. The House is being asked to pass the bill with' only a vague promise that some sort of tribunal will be set tip to inquire into matters that may have nothing to do with the social security tax. It will be no excuse for the

Government to say that it has been unable to devise a procedure to give justice to selfemployed persons. Will it be better able to do so later in the year? This administrative problem should have been considered before the Government decided to create the anomaly; and it should be considered again now before this inequitable clause is persisted with.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19580123.2.63

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28492, 23 January 1958, Page 10

Word Count
283

A Promise Unredeemed Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28492, 23 January 1958, Page 10

A Promise Unredeemed Press, Volume XCVII, Issue 28492, 23 January 1958, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert