LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume XCVI, Issue 28415, 23 October 1957, Page 3

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

1. Letters sent to the Editor tor printing must be written in ink on one side .of the paper only, and writers must send in their names and addresses in full, whether they wish these to be printed or not 2. Writers must say clearly whether r or not their letters are being or have been sent to other papers 3. The Editor cannot return or keep any letter w’hich for any reason is unsuitable for printing, nor can he acknowledge unsuitable letters, although this will be done where it seems to be needful, or enter into any correspondence. 4 Letters must not be of more than 150 words in length.

Hedley C. Hooper.—Forwarded to the author. Insight.—Would reopen a correspondence recently closed. Shopkeeper.—Letters limited to 150 words. See rules above. L.S.—Subsequent Ministerial statement seems to answer your letter. K. N. Whitford.—lt has been advertised. Tomorrow, 8 p.m., Latimer Hall.

One Guide, One Law.—Would reopen more than one subject recently closed. One in Need.—You asked a question. It may take a little time to obtain a reply Motor-cyclist.—The daily Court reports suggest that you are doing the Transport Department less than justice. Arco.—Thank you. As we under-' I stand it, neither is purely a place name, but, in one case, an amenity, in the other, a building. Reader.—We have space to report only a small fraction of the daily speeches in Parliament. Explanations of Government policy naturally have first claim on our space, whatever government is in power. Civic Pride.—A "wonderful solution," perhaps, if there were any problem. But the City Council has not, as far as we are aware, been given any reason to change its opinion, based on good professional advice, that the "Limes" site is too small for the purpose; and there is no reason to believe that the Diocese of Christchurch is dissatisfied with its site or its building plans.