Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NEW N.Z. HOUSE IN LONDON

Revised Plan May Be Approved

(Rec. 11.30 p.m.) LONDON, Dec. 20. Plans for the New Zealand House building were discussed yesterday by the Town Planning Committee of the London County Council.

It is understood that the committee agreed that the type of building proposed was appropriate to the site—at the corner of the Haymarket and Pall Mall—and that it expressed a preference for the second of two designs that have been put forward.

The L.C.C. has no statutory powers in this case, because buildings on Crown Lands are exempt from planning control, but the newly-renamed Crown Estate Commissioners, who are the ground landlords, have said that they are anxious to have the views of the L.C.C. before making a decision. They disapproved of an earlier scheme, but have so far expressed no opinion on the various alternatives prepared by the architect. Professor R. H. Matthew. An early meeting between the commissioners and representatives of the New Zealand Government. in which the commissioners* views will be given, is expected. “The Times” said the second design, which the JL.C.C. is said to prefer, has a rectangular instead of an Lshaped tower. The earlier tower was broader and would look even more so when seen diagonally. ‘‘The Times" said the revised version was undoubtedly an improvement not only for this reason, but because it was lighter in treatment, being patterned all over with windows, whereas the first version included a staircase wall of solid brickwork pierced only by a small window on each floor.

It said the first version was the one preferred by the New Zealand Cabinet. The Cabinet, however, had not examined the second in detail and there was no reason to abandon its approval of the first.

If the Crown Estates Commissioners, after the favourable reception the revised scheme has received, decide not to oppose it in spite of the criticisms initially made by the Royal Fine Art Commissioner and others, it is likely that the New Zealand Government will be prepared to transfer its approval to the second scheme, “The Times” said.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19561221.2.94

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCIV, Issue 28157, 21 December 1956, Page 12

Word Count
348

NEW N.Z. HOUSE IN LONDON Press, Volume XCIV, Issue 28157, 21 December 1956, Page 12

NEW N.Z. HOUSE IN LONDON Press, Volume XCIV, Issue 28157, 21 December 1956, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert