Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

£7000 AWARDED TO WIDOW

DEATH IN DOBSON MINE ACCIDENT (From Our Own Reporter) GREYMOUTH .November 22. An award of £7OOO to Mrs Emma Martha Catherine Granger as damages for the death of her husband in an accident in the Dobson coal mine last April was made by a jury in the Supreme Court at Greymouth. Judgment for this amount was entered by his Honour, Mr Justice Adams, together with costs. Summing up before the jury retired, his Honour said the facts resolved themselves into a question of liability and of damages. The case rested upon two separate allegations of breach of statutory duty and negligence referring to an absence of suitable tools for the erection of props It was a question rather of whether it was reasonable practice to avoid having Grainger shovelling coal under a roof before it had been made secure even if it meant taking more time His Honour told the jury that an unstable roof was a potential killer The statute demanded that such a roof be made secure. At the time of the accident Grainger had been engaged in shovelling coal into a box and had not been doing anything to make the roof safe. “Counsel for the plaintiff has told you that the claim for £BOOO is a just one. and that you should award every penny of it.” said his Honour. “On the facts, in my opinion, the claim is exorbitant, and you would not be justified in allowing anything like that amount. The proper course for you to adopt would be to disregard altogether the amount claimed and arrive at a sum on your own conclusions.” His Honour said a sounder approach would be to ask what pecuniary value the wife and children derived from the husband, or what they would have derived. The jury should ask themselves what was a fair and adequate sum to allow, and at the same time do justice *to the widow and family, to the Crown and to the taxpayer.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19561123.2.167

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCIV, Issue 28133, 23 November 1956, Page 16

Word Count
334

£7000 AWARDED TO WIDOW Press, Volume XCIV, Issue 28133, 23 November 1956, Page 16

£7000 AWARDED TO WIDOW Press, Volume XCIV, Issue 28133, 23 November 1956, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert