TELEVISION IN BRITAIN
X)RDS TO ATTACK POLICY LONDON, Nov. 19. «rong attack on the Government’s television policy will be led in of Lords next week by Lord with the support of Lords tetey, Samuel, Jowitt, Simon, “> Brand, and Hailsham. “Jjll speak i n support of a motion n< rec °gnising the desirabilan alternative television proD ® e » this House regrets it cannot «ve the proposals of Her Majesty’s “Wfent outlined in the memoranoa television policy.” correspondent of the JJJire Post” says: “This is a forW®te array of critics, to which must 'p®«y be added a senior bishop, if L OB 6 of the archbishops. be taken that the Bench of jS B the Socialist and'Liberal E* 8 will vote almost stffidly for the Lord Halifax’s considerffofluence among the older Concannot be without effect. wSi e Government is confident that the motion can be dethat it can be rejected by margin. ■J* so many of what might be ■glactive peers are in favour of BJWnment leaders in the House Kt/S will have to summon up w/?? s of backwoodsmen—those rarely attend debates in the
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19531121.2.67
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27203, 21 November 1953, Page 7
Word Count
182TELEVISION IN BRITAIN Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27203, 21 November 1953, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.