Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NEW TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

“IMPOSSIBLE AND IMPRACTICABLE”

PROTEST BY MOTOR UNION

The recent legislation requiring all hired motor-vehicles and public transport vehicles to stop at railway crossings was described as “impossible and impracticable” by members of the South Island Motor Union in Christchurch last evening. After dis.cussion, it was decided to urge the Government to reconsider its legislation in section II of the Traffic Act, 1953, as ‘ ‘it was not in all cases in the best interests of traffic, and had been found impracticable.” The union will object to the legislation requiring all traffic to stop when children are set down by or taken on board school buses.

“These two amendments will bring the law into disrepute, through being disobeyed,” said Mr C. M. Rout. “Obedience is impossible and impracticable. Thousands of lines are crossed by taxis. They don’t stop because there is no need to stop.” If all hired traffic and public transport vehicles were stopped at the Riccarton crossing on a race day, there would be a line of, vehicles stretching back to Cathedral square, he said. “The policing of our roads is the main trouble,” said Mr Rout. “If our roads were policed in the way of education, with prosecution if necessary, that would be the remedy rather than bring in extra legislation.”

“Hasty” Legislation “Can’t we object strongly to the authorities for pushing this legislation through in haste and without the consultation of the motor unions in both islands?” said Mr W. R. Carey, when the meeting discussed the regulation requiring all traffic to stop when school buses were taking on or setting down passengers. “We must raise an objection ’to all stoppage,” Mr Carey said. “Why should oncoming traffic on the other side of the road nave to stop as well as traffic behind the bus?” he asked. “We should object to closing the road while children are embarking or disembarking from buses.” Under the present education system, children soon become conversant with traffic regulations and it should not have been necessary to bring in the amended legislation, said Mr Carey. School buses travelling into the city could cause a “terrific” holdup. The two resolutions were then passed to be conveyed by the secretary to the Government.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19531121.2.12

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27203, 21 November 1953, Page 2

Word Count
371

NEW TRAFFIC REGULATIONS Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27203, 21 November 1953, Page 2

NEW TRAFFIC REGULATIONS Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27203, 21 November 1953, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert