Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRUCE TALKS HITCH

Enemy Rejection Of U.N. Plan

(NX. Press Association— Copyright) (Rec. 830 pan.) SEOUL, May 14. The Communist armistice negotiators today rejected as “absolutely unacceptable” the plan presented by the United Nations yesterday for the disposal of prisoners of war refusing repatriation. “We resolutely reject it,” General Nam 11, head of the Communist delegation, said at a meeting of the negotiators at Panmunjon today. General Nam II said that the Allied proposal “tends to overthrow the basis of negotiations of both sides.”

Then turning to Lieutenant-General William Harrison, the chief United Nations delegate, General Nam II said: “Your proposal is absolutely unacceptable.”

The Allies had proposed yesterday that the projected fivenation commission should supervise non-Korean prisoners only—meaning the Chinese Communists. They also said that the commission should function for only 60 days instead of the four months proposed by the Communists. This, they laid, was more in the spirit of the Geneva Convention on war prisoners and would prevent prisoners being coerced into returning home out of fear of remaining in custody indefinitely.

The Allies had also proposed that India should head the commission and should be the only country to send armed forces and administrative personnel to Korea. The other nations—Sweden, Switzerland. Poland and Czechoslovakia—would have only staff assistants. When rejecting the Allied move, General Nam II told General Harrison that the Communists had made a preliminary study of the United Nations proposal, and found it unacceptable. After today’s meeting General Harrison said: “Their proposal of May 7 is completely unsatisfactory to us, and they said that burs of yesterday is completely unsatisfactory to them. That's where we stand now.” The United Press said that Allied hopes for an early armistice have now plunged. The blunt and formal rejection of the Allied plan has left the future of the current truce talks in doubt, the news agency said. Churchill Speech “Influence" Some American observers said that the Communist attitude followed Sir Winston Churchill’s statement to the

House of Commons that he could see no reason why the Communist eightpoint plan could not serve as a baste for agreement if the Communists were sincere. The Americans speculated that the Communists had taken Sir Winston Churchill's statement as an endorsement of their plan and were hoping that British pressure would force the United Nations negotiators to give in. At today’s meeting both the Communists and ttie United Nations negotiators called for “reconsideration" of their respective proposals. i At the request of the Communists, the talks went into recess until tomorrow.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19530515.2.105

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27040, 15 May 1953, Page 9

Word Count
421

TRUCE TALKS HITCH Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27040, 15 May 1953, Page 9

TRUCE TALKS HITCH Press, Volume LXXXIX, Issue 27040, 15 May 1953, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert