Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STREET SIGNS IN LONDON

Ban In Trafalgar Square (Rec. 8 pm.) LONDON, October 22. Sir Harold Webbe, Conservative M.P. for the Cities of London and Westminster, has joined the battle of Trafalgar Square which has been going on in the Westminster City Council and in the columns of almost every London newspaper on the merits and demerits of illuminated advertising signs round Trafalgar Square, which the council has decided must come down. Speaking at a meeting of Conservatives in Knightsbridge Sir Harold Webbe said that the council’s ban on ■the signs was “a hopeless mistake” Bind that Trafalgar Square without was just “a Black Hole of Calcutta.” *

The City Council, he said, had no mandate from the people to ban advertisements. If Londoners did not like the signs they would find a way of Showing it, but he had not heard anyone ask for their removal “except for a few of the artistic fraternity and we have to look out for those beggars because they gave us the Festival ot Britain and an appalling collection of monuments.”

Sir Harold Webbe added: “Nelson atop his column must feel a little less lonely when he can look at the ad-

vertisements—not very artistic or inspiring, but signs of a city in which real people live and do business. “I think Trafalgar Square is magnificent and I have looked at it as often as some of these long-haired Smtlemen pretend to have done. The ct that there are signs which I can see if I turn round does not upset me. If there were twice as many, Trafalgar would still be a great naval victory, the National Gallery would still be the home of the finest collection of pictures in the world, and St. Martins would still be a holy place pointing e delicate pearl-grey finger to

•Tf anyone can tell me that the square loses its dignity by being reminded that ordinary people still live in this city, I don’t believe him. I thought wiser thoughts would prevail. We ere being made dull enough by circumstances. Let us keep a bit of merriment, even if it is neon lighting.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19521023.2.91

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXVIII, Issue 26869, 23 October 1952, Page 9

Word Count
357

STREET SIGNS IN LONDON Press, Volume LXXXVIII, Issue 26869, 23 October 1952, Page 9

STREET SIGNS IN LONDON Press, Volume LXXXVIII, Issue 26869, 23 October 1952, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert