Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

JUDGE’S ADDRESS TO GRAND JURY

TRUE BILLS RETURNED

“Your task to-day is fortunately a comparatively light’ one, because this is a light calendar, compared, at any rate, with the calendars we have had at recent sittings of this Court, there being only three bills of indictment for your consideration,” said Mr Justice Northcroft, addressing the Grand Jury at the opening of the quarterly sessions of the Supreme Court in Christchurch yesterday. The first charge for their consideration was that against a man, Richard Croke, who was charged with forgary. An Interest warrant was issued by the New Zealand Farmers’ Co-operative Association of Canterbury, Ltd., to a James Casey and it went missing in the post. When Casey did not receive it inquiries were set afoot and it was found that the warrant had been lodged in a bank by a Mr Jones, a barber, of Hereford street. He said it had been cashed with him by Croke. It had been endorsed with the name of Casey, and, a handwriting expert would say that the writing was that of Croke.

The next matter was a series of charges of theft as a servant against Walter Collinson Carr, who' was for some years manager of the city abattoir, said his Honour. The depositions showed that from time to time Carr sold hay, received money, paid it into Ms own bank account, and did not account for it to the Christchurch City Council. Carr’s explanation was that, from time to time, he was at personal expense for the repair of fences and to make good losses of animals, and he had used the proceeds from the sale of hay as a set off. There were three charges of obscene exposure against James McAuley end they depended upon identification. It appeared clear that someone had been exposing himself in the Ashburton district, nut it was lor the Grand Jury to say whether the evidence of identification was sufficiently reliable to warrant McAuley being put upon his trial. The Grand Jury returned true bills on all counts. .

Juror Fined £1 When Joseph Millner Preston was called for the Grand Jury, he did not answer. After the Grand Jury had retired to consider the bills of indictment, he appeared before his Honour and explained that he had been delayed by a business engagement and had arrived at the Court a few minutes late.

He was fined £l. Prisoner Pleads Guilty Richard Croke. aged 59, a labourer, pleaded guilty when he appeared on a charge that, on February 23, he forged a New Zealand Fanners’ Co-operative Association of Canterbury. Ltd., interest warrant in favour of James Casey, for £lB. by endorsing the name James Casey i’Z 1 J , back of * he warrant, with intent that it be acted on as genuine. Hs was remanded for sentence.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19510509.2.29

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 26416, 9 May 1951, Page 4

Word Count
471

SUPREME COURT Press, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 26416, 9 May 1951, Page 4

SUPREME COURT Press, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 26416, 9 May 1951, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert