Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AMENDMENTS TO TENANCY BILL

HOUSE AND COUNCIL DISAGREE

UNUSUAL PROCEDURE NECESSARY

(From Our Parliamentary Reporter.) WELLINGTON, September 7. The House of Representatives this afternoon accepted the amendments of the Legislative Council to the Land Transfer Amendment Bill and the Magistrate’s Courts’ Amendment Bill, but two small amendments from the Council to the Tenancy Amendment Bill caused some discussion „ Th , e „ Meister in charge of the bill, Mr W. Sullivan, first suggested that one of these amendments be accepted and the other disagreed with, but Mr A McLagan (Opposition, Riccarton). objected to both of the Council’s amendments. Finally, on the motion of Mr Sullivan, both amendments were disagreed with, and the Attor-ney-General (Mr T. C. Webb) and Messrs McLagan and Sullivan were appointed a committee “to draw up reasons to be assigned to the Legislative Council for disagreeing with its amendments.”

By disagreeing with the amendments suggested by the Legislative Council the House committed itself to an unusual course. The only occasion in the last 10 years on which similar action was taken was in .946, when the present Prime Minister (Mr Holland) introduced the Riccarton Bush Amendment Bill.

In the past, amendments from the Legislative Council have been inspired by the Government of the day, and were therefore accepted readily. The present Legislative Council, in its last year of office, however, has decided to suggest amendments of its own. The snec’al committee appointed by the House to draw up reasons for disagreeing with the Legislative Councils amendments to the Tenancy Amendment Bill will submit its report to the House. If the committee’s statement is approved, it will be sent by message to the Legislative Council. The reasons will then be considered by the Legislative Council, which will have two alternatives: it can either agree with the reasons, or disagree and ask for n committee of managers of both Houses to settle the issue.

The usual procedure of setting up a committee of managers was last resorted to in the Riccarton Bush Amendment Bill in 1947.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19500908.2.50

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26212, 8 September 1950, Page 6

Word Count
335

AMENDMENTS TO TENANCY BILL Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26212, 8 September 1950, Page 6

AMENDMENTS TO TENANCY BILL Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26212, 8 September 1950, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert