Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FENCING

AUSTRALIA WINS EPEE

(New Zealand Press Association) AUCKLAND. February 8. Australia won the men’s epee teams’ contest to-day. New Zealand was soundly defeated by Canada in the first round and lost the second round to England by three to six, but it held the successful Australian team to a close decision, five to four, in the third round. The final placings were:—

Australia .. .. ..1 England .. .. ..2 Canada .. .. ..3 New Zealand .. ..4 Details;— Australia v. Canada Jay beat Desjarlais, 3-5; Jay lost to Brooke, 1-3; Jay beat Pouliot, 3-2; Lund beat Desjarlais, 3-1; Lund lost to Brooke, 2- Lund beat Pouliot. 3-2; Stanmore lost to Desjarlais, 0-3; Stanmore lost to Brooke. 0-3; Stanmore beat Pouliot, 3-1. Australia v. N.Z. Jay lost to Shaw. 2-3; Jay beat Elsom, 3- Jay lost to Ward, 1-3; Lund beat Shaw. 3-2; Lund beat Elsom. 3-0; Lund lost to Ward, 2-3; Stanmore lost to Shaw, 0-3; Stanmore beat Elsom, 3-2; Stanmore beat Ward, 3-2. England v, Canada Anderson beat Desjarlais. 3-0; de Beaumont beat Desjarlais. 3-0; Paul beat Desjarlais. 3-1; de Beaumont beat Pouliot, 3-1; Anderson beat Pouliot. 3-2; Paul beat Pouliot. 3-2; Paul beat Brooke, 3-2; Anderson beat Brooke. 3-2; de Beaumont beat Brooke. 3-2. Canada v. N.Z. First Round Piste One.—G. Pouliot (Can.) 3, J. H. Malcolm (N.Z.) 2; R. Desjarlais (Can.) 3. W. S. Elsom (N.Z.) 2; E. Brooke (Can.) 3, H. E. Cox (N.Z.) 0; Desjarlais 3, Malcolm 3 (counts as both defeated): Pouliot 3. Cox 1; Brooke 3. Elsom 1; Brooke 3, Malcolm 1; Pouliot 3. Elsom 0; Desjarlais 3, Cox 1. Summary.—Pouliot, 3 wins, no defeats; Brooke. 3. 0; Desjarlais, 2,1; Malcolm. 0,3; Elsom, 0,3; Cox, 0, 3. Piste Two.—C. L. de Beaumont (Eng.) 3. A. L. Jay (Aust.) 2; R. R. Paul (Eng.) 3, C. Stanmore (Aust.) 1; I. Lund (Aust.) 3, R. J. Anderson (Eng.) 1: Stanmore 3. de Beaumont 1; Lund 3. Paul 1; Anderson 3. Jay 2; de Beaumont 3, Lund 3; (both defeated); Jay 3, Paul 1; Anderson 3, Stanmore 2. Summary.—Anderson, 2 wins, 1 defeat; Lund, 2,1; de Beaumont. 1. 2; Paul, 1,2; Jay, 1,2; Stanmore, 1,2. England v. N.Z. De Beaumont 3, Elsom 2; Shaw 3, Anderson 1; Paul 3, Malcolm 1; de Beaumont 3, Shaw 1; Anderson 3, Malcolm 1; Paul 3, Elsom 0; de Beaumont 3, Malcolr 0; Elsom 3, Anderson 2; Shaw 3, Paul 0. Summary.—de Beaumont 3 wins, 0 defeats; Shaw, 2,1: Paul, 2,1; Anderson. 1, 2; Elsom, 1,2; Malcolm, 0, 3.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19500209.2.99

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26033, 9 February 1950, Page 6

Word Count
414

FENCING Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26033, 9 February 1950, Page 6

FENCING Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26033, 9 February 1950, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert