FUTURE OF UNO

Press, Volume LXXXII, Issue 24799, 13 February 1946, Page 7

FUTURE OF UNO

RIFT BETWEEN SOVIET AND BRITAIN NO AUTHORITY OVER GREAT POWERS ' (Special Correspondent N.Z.PA.) LONDON, February 11. of opinion about the VnHoH and effectiveness of the Nations as an instrument for maintaining world peace are making themselves evident here as the first session of the General Assembly draws to a busy and rather weary close. One and _‘, he other not so much Pessimistic as realistic. . 'v 3p . optimists, emphasising the efficiency with which UNO nas Deen launched and the eventual the C nr^ lO, rr that have s 0 far ma >*ed the proceedings of the Security CounUso’Sn apparently convinced that ¥£.9 ork - They see in the “open fe cus sions the Security Council—those that are not conducted in a small comes fe/V five minutes that besetfl?no t n? • hours—the great Powers Sil “Fk t disputes at what they Tr N A h 'L bar . of world opinion.” a nil St-they feel > has taken the strain, Str -T n ’ hut is holding. tin “J he S’? 11 ®* ffld handshakes the eonn’SV’n of the . B ‘g Three in torv stUrU r °om a satisfying conciliawitti SsSk yhich bears comparison the “PPouents who meet in 3 Vlolent de bate “on thlt n is°g 0 ‘ 0 d S House ” “d they feel ion U LnSSI X “Other trend of opinharidshak? 8 • ! ? eyo , nd the sentiment and sons “.asks what are the reaRrasii h-A he a tough” attitude which sSSritvc„?,° P , ted u not on ’y in ‘he UNO rt.n.9? unc “’ hut also in other Particular?^™ 15 ; J'hich seems to be The a gainst Britain. declared'nnoJ? H- n ? s ls ? bat Russia has P diPfenratic war on Britcovertfv rt.JSt Commonwealth—and to effect a fei 3 *T r V lin eagerness and taUnitedStX Ween Brital ” Council and Assembly the discussion in veal p ou F CII has served to reiween q thr» e t Clearly this cleava ge bedecisiois e r eac°hArt U £ tries ,? nd that ‘he to mend th! S d have done nothing a| terld d the fact tha?’ ? hey ha - ve not contact exist S tha “ S’ here points of ain in th? R b fv Ween Russia and Britand in Persia k f apS ,'- the Middle East, cur. sia ’ Action can easily ochave iS flran?v f i*t u’r'u 1 j Cse discussions that the fnriF ' sb r’ d thc Principle inside UNO P°hey and decision Council aiiH with the Security and it i s a emnh Ot "j lth the Assembly, a sUper. s n !?Ph as ised that UNO is not 'enuitional SSI aat honty but an inthe practical n.,™ g col P mit fee. For Policy the c£S^ ses . o f international and hit the be looked to the veto-or Assembly. The effect of yeto—enables ?f ely the threat of the bloXinv ~ great Powers to remove”lnv s ?* u * lon ‘hey like, and it oil wih be l , tPace ‘hat the Counover its to exert any authority At the maner,L members. too eS,”.?’?’’ “ felt that it is the long-term ‘irn ecast Wlth certainty sion win havl ~l« ue ?>F e th ls first sesaffairs. Whiil tr end of world hi the forli i X Bl '9 ' v “l be one factor Powers t°reign policy of the great hardl?’ In ‘nought that it will come as Mrfereseeaoie time, betiding fart>-^n t! ? e h - oped ’ "the overTt ,n fereign policy.” ro ! reasonably certain that ain between Russia and Britating flah?,” 8 , tc remain the domintime B tol„J? of mS' orl ? affairs for some diPfemabcT- ?? cleava ge and open tries fiJJtio war between the two coun»onfc le m 1 ? r 4 a PP 3 rent. In the of Mr J. L. Garvin, there is a