Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SALE OF MOULDY PIE

FINE OF £SO IMPOSED (P.A.) AUCKLAND. May 15. “Mould is one of nature’s methods of giving warning that the food on which it is growing may not be fit to eat. It has always been interpreted that way by animals and normal human beings. Whatever exceptions there may be, a shop-made oie is not one of them, and he who sells a mouldy pie commits an offence.” This statement was made by Mr J. H. Luxford, S.M., in giving judgment in a case in which John George Hill was charged with selling food unfit for human consumption. Evidence had been given that a woman who bought a steak and egg pie from a city shop of Hill Bros., Ltd., found mould inside it as she was putting it in her oven. A Government analyst had examined it, and had stated that it was unfit for human consumption at the time of sale. A mycologist at the plant diseases division of the Department of, Scientific and Industrial Research, as a witness for the defendant, had stated that the mould on the pie was quite innocuous if eaten.

The Magistrate said that this witness based his opinion on the ground that all moulds belonging to the penicillium group were harmless, but he had not examined the pie in question. The Magistrate quoted expert medical opinion showing that it was dangerous for people to attempt to produce homemade penicillin from the mould found on bread, cheese, or other foods, and that many moulds so far studied had been shown to produce substances as harmful to animals as to bacteria, one having lately been advocated as a rat poison, and the same was likely to apply to the legion which had not yet been investigated. The Magistrate said he was not impressed by the defendant’s system of dealing with left-over pies at the end; of a day. Under his system it would" be possible for the same pie to be a left-over more than once before it was sold, and that probably happened to the pie in this case. A fine of £SO, with costs, was imposed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19440516.2.10

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXX, Issue 24258, 16 May 1944, Page 2

Word Count
357

SALE OF MOULDY PIE Press, Volume LXXX, Issue 24258, 16 May 1944, Page 2

SALE OF MOULDY PIE Press, Volume LXXX, Issue 24258, 16 May 1944, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert