Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED PATENT INFRINGEMENT

DISMISSAL BY APPEAL

COURT

CASE ON HAIR WAVING

PROCESS

(P.A.) WELLINGTON, December 11. The Court of Appeal delivered judgment to-day in the ease, Maeder versus the '‘Honda" Ladies’ Hairdressing Salon and others, dealing with a patent nonelectric hair waving process. The case, when heard by Mr Justice Smith in the Supreme Court at Wellington in June and July last year, occupied 18 days, and was believed to be probably the longest process case yet hoard in New Zealand. , , . The patentee, Frederick Maeder, of Adelaide, claimed that the patent had been infringed. Mr Justice Smith held that the patent was invalid, and also that the patent had not been infringed. From this judgment an appeal was made. In the judgment delivered to-day. the Chief Justice fthc Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Myers' held that the process was not patentable as not amounting to a manner of new manufacture, but he stated that if wrong in this view he disagreed with the findings of the trial Judge in the Court below in favour of the respondents. Mr Justice Kennedy upheld the trial Judge and found for the respondents on all points on which they were successful in the Court below. Mr Justice Johnston agreed with the view that the process was not patentable, and found for the respondents on all points on which they were successful in the Court below.

The appeal was dismissed, with costs allowed to the respondents on the highest scale, and an allowance of 15 guineas daily for each of the eight additional days in (ho Court of Appeal.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19421212.2.31

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23819, 12 December 1942, Page 4

Word Count
263

ALLEGED PATENT INFRINGEMENT Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23819, 12 December 1942, Page 4

ALLEGED PATENT INFRINGEMENT Press, Volume LXXVIII, Issue 23819, 12 December 1942, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert